Difference between revisions of "Project submission template"
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== One line summary == | == One line summary == | ||
<A short description of the project> | <A short description of the project> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Status == | ||
| + | <One of not started, started but not completed, abandonned, completed> | ||
== Description == | == Description == | ||
| Line 16: | Line 19: | ||
== Difficulty == | == Difficulty == | ||
<One of Low, Medium, High, Expert> | <One of Low, Medium, High, Expert> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Benefits == | ||
| + | <For both students and community> | ||
== Licensing == | == Licensing == | ||
| Line 27: | Line 33: | ||
== Possible mentor == | == Possible mentor == | ||
| − | <List of mentors responsible for that project> | + | <List of mentors responsible for that project, otherwise Undecided> |
Latest revision as of 09:30, 10 March 2009
<To better recognize the project idea, the name of the page should simply be EPI-XX-YYY where XX is a category identifier and YYY is simply a number following the sequence for the XX category>
Title
<Name of the project>
One line summary
<A short description of the project>
Status
<One of not started, started but not completed, abandonned, completed>
Description
<A full description of the project with potential internal or external references>
Skills needed
Difficulty
<One of Low, Medium, High, Expert>
Benefits
<For both students and community>
Licensing
<License requirement: usually either GPLv2 or EFLv2, but sometime any open source license would do.>
Documentation
<Where should the documentation be?>
Submitter
<Author of the project idea>
Possible mentor
<List of mentors responsible for that project, otherwise Undecided>
