Tutorial: Creating a Service
In this tutorial I'll demonstrate the process for integrating third-party services inside EiffelStudio and hooking up internal parts of EiffelStudio to use the new service.
Before we begin you should have a fundamental understanding of what a service is and a clear understanding of the guidelines for writing service
Note: This tutorial is followed up by another tutorial for creating an EiffelStudio tool for displaying information published by the service.
Contents
Getting Started
When extending EiffelStudio, it is a good idea to separate your code from the EiffelStudio code. The Customizing the EiffelStudio Project page describes the process of doing this.
Overview
IN this tutorial we'll be showing you how to create a service use to log messages. Although the service contains a simple interface, it's actually quite complete in that the service itself will make use of the Event List Service as a demonstration how reusing services in EiffelStudio can make development strategies quicker and easier.
Creating a Service Interface
The very first step in creating a service is to define a service interface. A service interface should contain either all deferred routines or deferred routines with only effective routines that reference the service interface directly or other interfaces in the EiffelStudio ecosystem.
Note: It is important to realize that the interface abstraction allows for complete freedom to be given to the implementation of the service. Implementation details are not public and should remain that way. No consumer of the service should ever attempt to reverse assign a retrieve service to the implementation class but to the interface class. Consumer of the service should not have to rely on the implementation details of a service and doing so will potentially break code in the future or if a different implementation is returned than expected when querying to a specific service.
This tutorial is creating a logger service so it makes senses we should create a service interface class call LOGGER_SERVICE_S
. Create a deferred class LOGGER_SERVICE_S
in your extension project cluster.
Note: All service interfaces, by convention, are suffixed _SERVICE_S
. This makes it clear to a consumer that they are using a service interface. All other related interfaces for the service should be suffixed _I
to indicate an interface.
The first step is to define LOGGER_SERVICE_S
as an actually service. In order to achieve this LOGGER_SERVICE_S
must inherit SERVICE_I
. As of EiffelStudio 6.1 SERVICE_I
does not contain any effective or deferred routines, it's merley a place holder for future additions and a method of classification.
So now you should have something looking like this:
deferred class LOGGER_SERVICE_S inherit SERVICE_I end
Of course this doesn't do all that much, in fact it does nothing! We need to add a way to log messages. For this we'll add put
routines; put_message
and put_message_with_severity
.
A logger shouldn't just simply log a message, it's just not powerful enough. So the put routines for the service should permit categorization and even indicate a level of severity incase a logger service consumer deems that a particular entry deserves more or less attention. Fortunatly Griffin offeres built in support for categorization and a basic priority level, which will serve quite nicely as a translation for a log item severity level.
Categories and Priorities
ENVIRONMENT_CATEGORIES
is a class consisting of constants defining EiffelStudio environment region categories. There are constants for the compiler, debugger the editor and so forth. As extenders you are free to add your own categories and utilize them. Any class can access a single instance of ENVIRONMENT_CATEGORIES
through SHARED_ENVIRONMENT_CATEGORIES.categories
.
PRIORITY_LEVELS
is another class containing constants for basic priority levels; high, normal and low. Any class can access a single instance of PRIORITY_LEVELS
through SHARED_PRIORITY_LEVELS.priorities
.
We want to make use of both categories and priorites in the logger service so LOGGER_SERVICE_S
should inherit both SHARED_ENVIRONMENT_CATEGORIES
and SHARED_PRIORITY_LEVELS
.
Warning: Inheriting the shared classes should not affect the service interface so be sure to set the export status when inheriting those shared classes!
ENVIRONMENT_CATEGORIES
and PRIORITY_LEVELS
in addition to being constant definition classes, also contain validation functions to ensure a category identifier is a known identifiers, as it true for a priorty identifier. In the practice of Design by Contract our service routines are going to be passed a category and severity (priority) level, which require validation. Given SHARED_ENVIRONMENT_CATEGORIES.categories
and SHARED_PRIORITY_LEVELS.priorities
are not exported members of the interface we'll need to create proxy query functions, which is actually good design. These proxy function can then be used an service routine preconditions and can also be used by a service consumer client when making the call to one of the service routines.
Below is the complete code for adding categories and severity levels to the logger service interface. The proxy function is_valid_category
has been added for category validation and is_valid_severity_level
added for severity level validation.
deferred class LOGGER_SERVICE_I inherit SERVICE_I SHARED_ENVIRONMENT_CATEGORIES export {NONE} all end SHARED_PRIORITY_LEVELS export {NONE} all end feature -- Query frozen is_valid_category (a_cat: NATURAL_8): BOOLEAN -- Determines if `a_cat' is a valid logger category -- -- `a_cat': A category identifier to validate. -- `Result': True to indicate the category is valid; False otherwise. do Result := categories.is_valid_category (a_cat) end frozen is_valid_severity_level (a_level: INTEGER_8): BOOLEAN -- Determines if `a_level' is a valid severity level -- -- `a_level': A severity level. -- `Result': True to indicate the level of severity is valid; False otherwise. do Result := priorities.is_valid_priority_level (a_level) end end
Adding Service Functionality
Still, the logger service has not functionality. The service interface is now at a stage where the actual service routines can be added. We're going to add three routines; two to log messages and another to clear the log.
Note: The logger created here is very simple. It would be highly likely for you to add routines to flush log entries and even provide a mutable status attribute to set an auto-flush mode. It's actually important to realize your design before releasing a service in a version of EiffelStudio, because once released then service interface may be used by others. In our case there is no flush routine, which means a later implementation of the logger service who's message flushing capabilities are expensive, will suffer bad performance penalties. The interface was already released without a flush routine so now a flush has to be performed every time a log message is added because existing consumer clients are not using the new service version's flush routine. When designing a service it's necessary to think how the service might be used by EiffelStudio, the Eiffel compiler and what might happen in the future. In the case of the logger you may have one EiffelStudio SKU that presents logged information in an embedded EiffelStudio tool, in another it may be pushed to the OS event log, in another it may be written to a file. Or, you might have all three available and a preference to indicate how added log messages are handled.
Here is the basic interface with the previous interface members elided for clarity.
deferred class LOGGER_SERVICE_I ... feature -- Extension put_message (a_msg: STRING_32; a_cat: NATURAL_8) -- Logs a message. -- -- `a_msg': Message text to log. -- `a_cat': A message category, see {ENVIRONMENT_CATEGORIES}. require a_msg_attached: a_msg /= Void not_a_msg_is_empty: not a_msg.is_empty a_cat_is_empty_is_valid_category: is_valid_category (a_cat) do put_message_with_severity (a_msg, a_cat, {PRIORITY_LEVELS}.normal) end put_message_with_severity (a_msg: STRING_32; a_cat: NATURAL_8; a_level: INTEGER_8) -- Logs a message specifying a severity level. -- -- `a_msg': Message text to log. -- `a_cat': A message category, see {ENVIRONMENT_CATEGORIES}. -- `a_level': A severity level for the message, See {PRIORITY_LEVELS}. require a_msg_attached: a_msg /= Void not_a_msg_is_empty: not a_msg.is_empty a_cat_is_empty_is_valid_category: is_valid_category (a_cat) a_level_is_valid_severity_level: is_valid_severity_level (a_level) deferred end feature -- Removal clear_log -- Clear any cached log data deferred end ... end
Adding Events
To be a good service citizen of EiffelStudio it is highly desirable to provide events service consumers can hook up to. Not all services have events but it so happens that the logger service is interacted with in a way that tools or other services may be interested in; a message is added and messaged are cleared.
Griffin provides its own even mechanism using EVENT_TYPE
, which is an extremely powerful event abstraction that is simple to use.
To facilitate event hooks we'll add the events message_logged_events
to notify subscribes when a message is added, and cleared_events
to notify subscribes when a clear operation was performed.
deferred class LOGGER_SERVICE_I ... feature -- Events message_logged_events: EVENT_TYPE [TUPLE [service: LOGGER_SERVICE_I; message: STRING_32; category: NATURAL_8; level: INTEGER_8]] -- Events called when a message has been logged deferred result_attached: Result /= Void result_consistent: Result = Result end cleared_events: EVENT_TYPE [TUPLE [service: LOGGER_SERVICE_I]] -- Events called when the messages have been cleared from the log deferred result_attached: Result /= Void result_consistent: Result = Result end ... end
Note, the events are deferred also. This given a logger service implementation the option to implement the events as attributes or deferred-evaluation functions, for performance and memory footprint optimizations. The postcondition result_consistent
ensures that any deferred-evaluation/once-per-object implementation actually performs the correct per-object caching.
Respecting the events could be implemented using lazy-evaluation no class invariants have been added to ensure the event attributes are always attached, because (A) in deferred-evaluation they may not be attached until called and (B) evaluating the class invariants would remove any optimization benefits of deferred-evaluation as they would be evaluated after the service has been created.
Note: For events implemented as attributes it's desirable for the implementation to add the appropriate invariants to ensure the events at in an attached state after the logger service has been created.