Forget / Keep Mechanism
Warning: Warning: Article under development
Contents
Introduction
By allowing covariant feature redefinition and hiding of features, the Eiffel language introduces the problem of cat-calls (Changed Availability or Type). The forget / keep mechanism prevents this by introducing new derived types whenever a feature is covariantly redefined or the export status is restricted. These derived types are then used to prevent cat-calls through the conformance rules to the original types.
Example classes
The following classes will be used for illustration:
class ANIMAL feature eat (f: FOOD) sleep end |
class CAT inherit ANIMAL redefine eat export {NONE} sleep end feature eat (f: CAT_FOOD) end |
class FOOD end class CAT_FOOD inherit FOOD end |
class LIST [G] feature has (g: G): BOOLEAN put (g: G) item: G end |
The problem
The problem of cat-calls has two variants, one because a feature is covariantly redefined:
local a: ANIMAL c: CAT food: FOOD do a := c -- illegal since `eat' for type CAT takes arguments only of type CAT_FOOD a.eat (food) end
And one because the visibility of features change:
local a: ANIMAL c: CAT do a := c -- `sleep' is hidden for type CAT and should not be called a.sleep end
The idea
To solve the problem of cat-calls, the idea is that whenever you covariantly redefine a feature of a parent type, you don't actually inherit this feature and redefine it, but you inherit from a parent type which does not have this feature at all. The same goes for changing the export status. When you restrict the export status of a feature, you don't inherit this feature from the parent but introduce it in the current type and inherit from a parent which does not know this feature at all.
As a consequence of this, the types as we know them don't necessarily conform to each other. If the type CAT
inherits from the type ANIMAL
but covariantly redefines the feature eat
than the type CAT
does not conform to ANIMAL
anymore, but only to a type ANIMAL
without the feature eat
.
This gives two corner cases, the first one is a type which keeps all features even if they get covarianlty redefined by other types. We call this type the keep all type since it keeps all features. All features defined in the class can be called on an instance of this type, but all subtypes which have a covariantly redefined feature or change an export status of a feature don't conform to the keep all type anymore.
The second case is a type which looses all feature which get covariantly redefined later on or whose export status is restricted. This type is called the forget all type since it forgets all problematic features. All subtypes will conform to this type even if they covariantly redefine a feature or change the export status. Since this type forgets all of these features, they cannot be called on such an instance.
Forget mechanism
The forget mechanism introduces a new keyword forget
which can be used to remove covarianlty redefined features and features which change the export status. By removing features, a new type is introduced. The new type has all features the original type has except those listed in the forget clause. If forget all
is used, all features which are covariantly redefined or have a changed export status will be removed from the new type.
Default behavior
In the forget mechanism the normal declaration of a type will keep all covariantly redefined features or features whose export status is restricted (keep all type). This implies that all subtypes which change an export status or covariantly redefine a feature don't conform to this type anymore.
local -- normal declaration means 'keep all' animal: ANIMAL cat: CAT do -- legal since the feature `eat' is kept in the normal type animal.eat (food) -- legal since the feature `sleep' is kept in the normal type animal.sleep -- illegal since CAT does not conform to ANIMAL (keep all) anymore animal := cat end
Syntax
-- normal declaration is an object with all features (keep all) and no -- subtype which has a covariantly redefined feature conforms to this type a1: ANIMAL -- a type which forgets all covariantly redefined features, thus all -- subtypes conform to this type. This is also called a 'poly' type a2: ANIMAL forget all end -- a type which only forgets the features `eat' and `sleep' but not other -- covarianlty redefined features or features whose export status is -- restricted. all subtypes which only redefine or change export status -- of `eat' or `sleep' will conform to this type a3: ANIMAL forget eat, sleep end
Conformance
The conformance between ANIMAL
, ANIMAL forget eat
, ANIMAL forget sleep
and ANIMAL forget all
is as follows:
local normal_animal: ANIMAL forget_eat_animal: ANIMAL forget eat end forget_sleep_animal: ANIMAL forget sleep end forget_all_animal: ANIMAL forget all end -- this is equivalent to the forget all clause as long as -- no other features of ANIMAL are covarianlty redefined forget_eat_sleep_animal: ANIMAL forget eat, sleep end do -- these assignments are legal since all features present in the -- forget types are also present in the normal type forget_eat_animal := normal_animal forget_sleep_animal := normal_animal forget_all_animal := normal_animal -- these assignment are illegal since the forget types lack -- at least one feature and thus cannot be used as an ANIMAL normal_animal := forget_eat_animal normal_animal := forget_sleep_animal normal_animal := forget_all_animal -- these assignments are legal since the forget all type -- has fewer or equal features than the other forget types forget_all_animal := forget_eat_animal forget_all_animal := forget_sleep_animal -- these assignments are illegal since the forget all type -- lacks one feature that the other types has (eat or sleep -- respectively) forget_eat_animal := forget_all_animal forget_sleep_animal := forget_all_animal -- these assignments are illegal since both types lack -- a feature which the other type has forget_eat_animal := forget_sleep_animal forget_sleep_animal := forget_eat_animal end
Keep mechanism
The keep mechanism is the contrary to the forget mechanism. It introduces a new keyword keep
which can be used to keep covarianlty redefined features and features which change the export status.
Default behavior
In the keep mechanism the normal declaration of a type will loose all covariantly redefined features or features whose export status is restricted (forget all type). This implies that all subtypes still conform to a normally declared type, but all covariantly redefined features will not be available.
local -- normal declaration means 'forget all' animal: ANIMAL cat: CAT do -- illegal since the feature `eat' is covariantly redefined animal.eat (food) -- illegal since the feature `sleep' changes export status animal.sleep -- legal since animal has no problematic features animal := cat end
Syntax
-- normal declaration is an object which forgets all covariantly -- redefined features. all subtypes conform to this type b1: ANIMAL -- a type which keeps all features and looses conformance from subtypes which -- covariantly redefine features. this is also called 'mono' b2: ANIMAL keep all end -- a type where all subtypes conform except those who covariantly redefine -- feature `eat' b3: ANIMAL keep eat end
Conformance
The conformance between ANIMAL
, ANIMAL keep eat
, ANIMAL keep sleep
and ANIMAL keep all
is as follows:
local normal_animal: ANIMAL keep_eat_animal: ANIMAL keep eat end keep_sleep_animal: ANIMAL keep sleep end keep_all_animal: ANIMAL keep all end -- this is equivalent to the keep all clause as long as -- no other features of ANIMAL are covarianlty redefined keep_eat_sleep_animal: ANIMAL keep eat, sleep end do -- these assignments are illegal since the normal ANIMAL type -- does not have the eat or sleep features keep_eat_animal := normal_animal keep_sleep_animal := normal_animal keep_all_animal := normal_animal -- these assignment are legal since the normal type has -- fewer features than the keep types normal_animal := keep_eat_animal normal_animal := keep_sleep_animal normal_animal := keep_all_animal -- these assignments are illegal since the keep all type -- has more features than the other keep types keep_all_animal := keep_eat_animal keep_all_animal := keep_sleep_animal -- these assignments are legal since the keep all type -- has more features than the other keep types keep_eat_animal := keep_all_animal keep_sleep_animal := keep_all_animal -- these assignments are illegal since both types lack -- a feature which the other type has keep_eat_animal := keep_sleep_animal keep_sleep_animal := keep_eat_animal end
Covariant feature redefinition
Cat-call problem
With covariant feature redefinition you run into cat-call problems as this example shows:
local a: ANIMAL c: CAT food: FOOD do a := c -- eat for type CAT takes arguments only of type CAT_FOOD a.eat (food) end
With forget mechanism
With the forget mechanism the default behavior for a type is to keep all problematic features. Types which have covariant redefined features will not be conform to the normal type. A feature which is covariantly redefined changes its inherit clause implicitly to inherit from a parent class which has the redefined feature in a forget clause.
what you write | what is implied |
---|---|
class CAT inherit ANIMAL redefine eat end feature eat (f: CAT_FOOD) end |
class CAT inherit ANIMAL forget eat redefine eat end feature eat (f: CAT_FOOD) end |
Now the cat-call example with the new forget types:
local a: ANIMAL c: CAT do -- illegal assignment, ANIMAL and CAT don't conform -- since CAT implicitly inherits from ANIMAL forget eat a := c a.eat (food) end
local a: ANIMAL forget all end c: CAT do -- legal, CAT conforms to ANIMAL forget all a := c -- illegal, ANIMAL forget all doesn't have a feature eat a.eat (food) end
With keep mechanism
With the keep mechanism the default behavior of a type is to loose all problematic features. Thus when a type covariantly redefines a feature, this implicitly changes the parent to loose this feature by default.
what you write | what is implied |
---|---|
class CAT inherit ANIMAL redefine eat end feature eat (f: CAT_FOOD) end |
feature |
Now the cat-call example with the new types:
local a: ANIMAL c: CAT do a := c -- illegal call since the type ANIMAL does not have a feature `eat' anymore a.eat (food) end
local a: ANIMAL keep all end c: CAT do -- illegal, CAT does not conform to ANIMAL keep all a := c -- legal, ANIMAL keep all still has the feature `eat' a.eat (food) end
Feature hiding
Cat-call problem
By restricting the export status of features, a cat-call problem is introduced:
local a: ANIMAL c: CAT do a := c -- sleep is hidden for type CAT and should not be called a.sleep end
With forget mechanism
With the forget mechanism the default behavior for a type is to keep all problematic features. Types which change the export status of features will not be conform to the normal type. A feature which has a restricted export status changes its inherit clause implicitly to inherit from a parent class which has the feature in a forget clause.
what you write | what is implied |
---|---|
class CAT inherit ANIMAL export {NONE} sleep end end |
class CAT inherit ANIMAL forget sleep export {NONE} sleep end end |
Now the cat-call example:
local a: ANIMAL c: CAT do -- illegal assignment, ANIMAL and CAT don't conform -- since CAT implicitly inherits from ANIMAL forget sleep a := c a.sleep end
local a: ANIMAL forget all end c: CAT do -- legal, CAT conforms to ANIMAL forget all a := c -- illegal, ANIMAL forget all doesn't have a feature sleep a.sleep end
With keep mechanism
With the keep mechanism the default behavior of a type is to loose all problematic features. Thus when a type changes the export status of a feature, this implicitly changes the parent to loose this feature by default.
what you write | what is implied |
---|---|
class CAT inherit ANIMAL export {NONE} sleep end end |
feature |
Now the cat-call example:
local a: ANIMAL c: CAT do a := c -- illegal call since the type ANIMAL does not have a feature `sleep' anymore a.sleep end
local a: ANIMAL keep all end c: CAT do -- illegal, CAT does not conform to ANIMAL keep all a := c -- legal, ANIMAL keep all still has the feature `sleep' a.sleep end
Generics
Conformance of generics - two generic conform if their generic parameters conform - introduce another kind of covariantly redefined features. Every feature which has a generic argument, e.g. put (g: G)
in class LIST [G]
can be regarded as covariantly redefined since put
in LIST [ANY]
takes an argument of type ANY
and put
in LIST [ANIMAL]
takes an argument of type ANIMAL
. But LIST [ANIMAL]
conforms to LIST [ANY]
, thus the feature put
is actually covariantly redefined in LIST [ANIMAL]
.
Cat-call problem
The conformance rules of generics alos introduce cat-call problems:
local -- feature `put' has argument type ANY any_list: LIST [ANY] -- feature `put' has argument type ANIMAL animal_list: LIST [ANIMAL] do -- animal_list conforms to any_list, but arguments of the feature -- `put' are different any_list := animal_list -- since any type can be put into any_list this will add -- an integer to the animal_list any_list.put (5) end
With forget mechanism
Default is keep all types and features with generic arguments are treated as covariantly redefined.
local any_list: LIST [ANY] animal_list: LIST [ANIMAL] do -- illegal since animal_list does not conform to any_list anymore any_list := animal_list any_list.put (5) end
local any_list: LIST [ANY] forget all end animal_list: LIST [ANIMAL] animal: ANIMAL do -- legal since animal_list conforms to LIST [ANY] forget all any_list := animal_list -- illegal since the forget all list does not have any features -- with generic arguments anymore any_list.put (5) -- illegal, same reason as above any_list.has (animal) end
With keep mechanism
Default is forget all types and features with generic arguments are treated as covariantly redefined.
local any_list: LIST [ANY] animal_list: LIST [ANIMAL] animal: ANIMAL do -- legal since any_list is 'forget all' and has no problematic features any_list := animal_list -- illegal since the feature 'put' is treated as covariantly redefined -- and thus not present in the 'forget all' type any_list.put (5) -- illegal, same reason as above any_list.has (animal) end
local any_list: LIST [ANY] keep all end animal_list: LIST [ANIMAL] do -- illegal since animal_list does not conform to -- any_list keep all anymore any_list := animal_list any_list.put (5) any_list.has (animal) end
Conformance
class A end class B inherit A redefine x (covariantly) end end class C inherit A end
a: LIST [A] b: LIST [A forget all end] c: LIST [A] forget all end d: LIST [A forget all end] forget all end e: LIST [B] f: LIST [B forget all end] g: LIST [B] forget all end h: LIST [B forget all end] forget all end i: LIST [C] k: LIST [C forget all end] l: LIST [C] forget all end m: LIST [C forget all end] forget all end
do -- illegal a := b b := a ...
The Java solution
With Java 1.5, generics were introduced in the language. A mechanism to prevent cat-calls with generics was introduced as well:
Consequences
Arguments with like
A declaration like Current
is a covariant redefinition for all subtypes. Thus the mechanism affects all types which have such arguments and their subtypes (see also next section):
With the forget mechanism the normal type keeps all features (keep all type) but subtypes with covariant feature redefinitions will loose conformance to this type. Thus with a like Current
argument in a feature f
, no subtype will conform to it's parent anymore unless the parent is declared forget f
.
With the keep mechanism the normal type forgets all problematic features (forget all type) and subtypes will still conform to this type. But this means that a feature f
with a like Current
argument will always be forgotten in a normal type and can only be used in keep f
types.
ANY
ANY
has the features ANY.is_equal
and ANY.copy
with a like Current
argument:
class ANY feature is_equal (other: like Current): BOOLEAN copy (other: like Current) end
Since all types are descendants of ANY
, all types have covariantly redefined features. Thus the both mechanisms - forget and keep - have an impact on the whole type hierarchy:
As discussed in the previous section, the forget mechanism defaults to keep all types but the subtypes don't conform to their normal parents anymore. Since ANY
introduces these features, no type will conform to any parent unless the parent is declared forget is_equal, copy
.
With the keep mechanism and forget all types as default, all types still conform to their parents, but the features is_equal
and copy
cannot be used unless a type is declared as keep is_equal, copy
. This declaration allows use of the features, but you will loose conformance of all subtypes.
Solution: Remove the like Current
arguments from ANY
. Change the argument of is_equal
and copy
to type ANY
. Then either introduce a precondition to require conformance of argument and object or add a type checks to the actual implementation of the features. This is actually done in the ECMA standard but not yet implemented in EiffelBase.
COMPARABLE
In the class COMPARABLE
all features are defined with a like Current
argument.
With the forget mechanism this means that when a class inherits from COMPARABLE
, no subtype will conform to this class anymore, unless all the compare features are forgotten.
Solution: Change the class to take a generic arugment and be able to compare to this argument (COMPARABLE [G]
)
export {NONE} all
With a declaration
class A inherit B export {NONE} all end end
the type A
restricts the visibility of all features of ANY
through restricting the features of B
.
With the forget mechanism the type A
will not conform to neither B
nor ANY
. Moreover the types B forget all
and ANY forget all
will not have any features since all features are affected by a change in export status.
With the keep mechanism and the default type being forget all type, any declaration of ANY
somewhere will not have any features since all features are affected by an export status restriction in the declaration of A
.
Solution: Introduce the inherit {NONE}
construct since most declarations of the type export {NONE} all
are actually meant as non-conforming inheritance in the first place. Since no conformance between parents from a inherit {NONE}
clause exists anyway, the forget / keep mechanism is not applied to these cases.
Algorithms
...
Generics
...
SET.has
...
Various problems
Let's say the class ANIMAL
has some other features as well and a class SNAKE
is introduced:
class ANIMAL feature eat (f: FOOD) a: ANIMAL feed_a local f: FOOD do a.eat (f) end x local f: FOOD do eat (f) end y local a: ANIMAL f: FOOD do a.eat (f) end z local a: ANIMAL do a := Current end end class SNAKE inherit ANIMAL redefine a end feature a: CAT end
If now CAT
covariantly redefines eat
the features x
, y
and z
in class CAT
are problematic. Depending on the default type (keep all or forget all) the features are not valid anymore and have to be forgotten in class CAT
as well.
In class SNAKE
the feature feed_a
of class ANIMAL
will become invalid by the redefinition of the feature a
.