Difference between revisions of "Talk:ProposalLibraryDependencies"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | --[[User:Paulb|Paulb]] 21:23, 14 November 2006 (CET) | + | '''--[[User:Paulb|Paulb]] 21:23, 14 November 2006 (CET)''' |
I don't know if the Examples are going to turn into anything concrete. I don't like a useless "'''com.'''" prefix. "'''eiffel.'''" is useless also because it's an Eiffel library. I'm assuming you meant "'''eiffelsoftware.'''" | I don't know if the Examples are going to turn into anything concrete. I don't like a useless "'''com.'''" prefix. "'''eiffel.'''" is useless also because it's an Eiffel library. I'm assuming you meant "'''eiffelsoftware.'''" | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*For the Eiffel parser: '''eiffelsoftware.eiffel.parser''' | *For the Eiffel parser: '''eiffelsoftware.eiffel.parser''' | ||
*For the Eiffel compiler: '''eiffelsoftware.eiffel.compiler''' | *For the Eiffel compiler: '''eiffelsoftware.eiffel.compiler''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''--[[User:Patrickr|Patrickr]] 22:37, 14 November 2006 (CET)''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | My idea was to use the url of the "company" producing the library to be sure that the name is unique, from most general to more specific. So from base from eiffel.com the idea was com.eiffel.base, gobo could then for example be net.sourceforge.gobo.base (basically the same schema that is used in the java world). | ||
Revision as of 12:37, 14 November 2006
--Paulb 21:23, 14 November 2006 (CET)
I don't know if the Examples are going to turn into anything concrete. I don't like a useless "com." prefix. "eiffel." is useless also because it's an Eiffel library. I'm assuming you meant "eiffelsoftware."
My suggestions for naming conventions should be:
<company>.<type>.<name>
- For EiffelBase: eiffelsoftware.library.base
- For a utiltiy framework: eiffelsoftware.framework.utilities
- For the Eiffel parser: eiffelsoftware.eiffel.parser
- For the Eiffel compiler: eiffelsoftware.eiffel.compiler
--Patrickr 22:37, 14 November 2006 (CET)
My idea was to use the url of the "company" producing the library to be sure that the name is unique, from most general to more specific. So from base from eiffel.com the idea was com.eiffel.base, gobo could then for example be net.sourceforge.gobo.base (basically the same schema that is used in the java world).
