|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Category:ECMA]] | | [[Category:ECMA]] |
| Author: Matthias Konrad | | {{Article will be deleted}} |
| | Author: Matthias Konrad[[Category:ECMA]] |
| | |
| ==The system== | | ==The system== |
| In this example we are studying a simple system with three classes that contains both renaming and selects: | | In this example we are studying a simple system with three classes that contains both renaming and selects: |
| Line 91: |
Line 93: |
| ===Calculating <math>\beta_{S_1}</math>=== | | ===Calculating <math>\beta_{S_1}</math>=== |
|
| |
|
| Since <math>\beta_{S_1}</math> contains only one class it is sufficient to define <math>\beta_{S_1}\left( C_1 \mapsto C_1 \right)</math>. According to the definition: | | Since <math>\beta_{S_1}</math> contains only one class it is sufficient to define <math>\beta_{S_1}\left( A \mapsto A\right)</math>. According to the definition: |
|
| |
|
| *<math> | | *<math> |
Template:Article will be deleted
Author: Matthias Konrad
The system
In this example we are studying a simple system with three classes that contains both renaming and selects:
class
A
feature
f1 do ... end
g1 do ... end
end
|
class
B
inherit
A
rename f1 as f2, g1 as g2
redefine f2, g2 end
feature
f2 do ... end
g2 do ... end
end
|
class
D
inherit
A
redefine f1, g1
select g1 end
B
select f2 end
feature
f1 do ... end
g1 do ... end
end
|
This system is defined by:
The naming function
We proceed by calculating the naming function. According to its definition we have to do that incrementally. Meaning that we first calculate then and finally .
Calculating
Since contains only one class it is sufficient to define . According to the definition:
We can forget about the right part of the union since has no base classes. So we need to calculate:
-
So we get:
And hence:
Calculating
We show the calculation of the different (four) parts of the function in separate sections:
Calculate
According to the definition:
Calculate
According to the definition:
Calculate
According to the definition:
Lets calculate the left part first:
And now the right part:
So we get:
Calculate
According to the definition:
Where:
And:
Here are the steps taken to compute the part:
-
-
So we get:
Putting the parts together:
We can know show the complete total function:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculating
We will not show the complete construction of but restrict our self to the most interesting parts.
Calculate
According to the definition:
Where:
And:
Note that we can omit from the formulas since it is always empty.
-
-
So we get:
The complete naming function
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The dynamic binding function
To calculate the dynamic binding function, we need to get . We will again calculate it incrementally:
Calculating
According to the definition:
Since is empty this simplifies to:
So we get:
Calculating
Again we calculate the different parts of the function in separate sections:
Calculate
According to the definition:
Calculate
According to the definition:
Calculate
According to the definition:
-
So we get:
Calculate
According to the definition:
At this stage it should be clear how to calculate this, so we just give the result:
Putting the parts together:
We can know show the complete total function:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculating
There is nothing new for this calculation so we just present the result:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deriving the dynamic binding function
The function is now given. We evaluate it at two interesting points: