DynBindModelExamples: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:ECMA]] | [[Category:ECMA]] | ||
Author: Matthias Konrad | {{Article will be deleted}} | ||
Author: Matthias Konrad[[Category:ECMA]] | |||
==The system== | ==The system== | ||
In this example we are studying a simple system with three classes that contains both renaming and selects: | In this example we are studying a simple system with three classes that contains both renaming and selects: | ||
| Line 45: | Line 47: | ||
|} | |} | ||
This system is defined by: | This system is defined by: | ||
<math>S=\left\{ A, B, D\right\}</math> | <math>S=\left\{ A, B, D\right\}</math> | ||
| Line 90: | Line 93: | ||
===Calculating <math>\beta_{S_1}</math>=== | ===Calculating <math>\beta_{S_1}</math>=== | ||
Since <math>\beta_{S_1}</math> contains only one class it is sufficient to define <math>\beta_{S_1}\left( | Since <math>\beta_{S_1}</math> contains only one class it is sufficient to define <math>\beta_{S_1}\left( A \mapsto A\right)</math>. According to the definition: | ||
*<math> | *<math> | ||
Latest revision as of 10:11, 11 April 2007
Template:Article will be deleted Author: Matthias Konrad
The system
In this example we are studying a simple system with three classes that contains both renaming and selects:
class A feature f1 do ... end g1 do ... end end |
class B inherit A rename f1 as f2, g1 as g2 redefine f2, g2 end feature f2 do ... end g2 do ... end end |
class D inherit A redefine f1, g1 select g1 end B select f2 end feature f1 do ... end g1 do ... end end |
This system is defined by:
The naming function
We proceed by calculating the naming function. According to its definition we have to do that incrementally. Meaning that we first calculate then and finally .
Calculating
Since contains only one class it is sufficient to define . According to the definition:
We can forget about the right part of the union since has no base classes. So we need to calculate:
So we get:
And hence:
Calculating
We show the calculation of the different (four) parts of the function in separate sections:
Calculate
According to the definition:
Calculate
According to the definition:
Calculate
According to the definition:
Lets calculate the left part first:
And now the right part:
So we get:
Calculate
According to the definition:
Where:
And:
Here are the steps taken to compute the part:
So we get:
Putting the parts together:
We can know show the complete total function:
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Calculating
We will not show the complete construction of but restrict our self to the most interesting parts.
Calculate
According to the definition:
Where:
And:
Note that we can omit from the formulas since it is always empty.
So we get:
The complete naming function
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
The dynamic binding function
To calculate the dynamic binding function, we need to get . We will again calculate it incrementally:
Calculating
According to the definition:
Since is empty this simplifies to:
So we get:
Calculating
Again we calculate the different parts of the function in separate sections:
Calculate
According to the definition:
Calculate
According to the definition:
Calculate
According to the definition:
So we get:
Calculate
According to the definition:
At this stage it should be clear how to calculate this, so we just give the result:
Putting the parts together:
We can know show the complete total function:
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Calculating
There is nothing new for this calculation so we just present the result:
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Deriving the dynamic binding function
The function is now given. We evaluate it at two interesting points: