Difference between revisions of "Talk:Syntax checking/SRS"

m
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
[[User:Manus|manus]] 19:03, 2 May 2006 (CEST)
 
[[User:Manus|manus]] 19:03, 2 May 2006 (CEST)
 +
 +
Manu, thanks for the feedback and hints.
 +
 +
Some people thaught that an timing-based parser would be better. Who is of the same opionion? Please use this discussion, as we need to finalize the specifications soon.

Revision as of 13:29, 5 May 2006

Please give some feedback regarding SRS so far

Manus

It is great. For the syntax validity, create an instance of EIFFEL_PARSER with the AST_NULL_FACTORY for the factory. That way it is quite efficient for the parsing.

manus 19:03, 2 May 2006 (CEST)

Manu, thanks for the feedback and hints.

Some people thaught that an timing-based parser would be better. Who is of the same opionion? Please use this discussion, as we need to finalize the specifications soon.