Talk:Read-write types

Revision as of 17:49, 6 July 2007 by Peter gummer (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

--Peter gummer 03:49, 7 July 2007 (CEST) This is very hard to understand. I still don't understand it. Maybe the words read and write are confusing me. These are obviously bad keywords anyway, because read and write would already be used as procedure names in many classes, so is there something more descriptive? How about polymorphic and monomorphic? I don't know whether these are accurate, because as I said I don't understand the proposal yet; but it doesn't bother me having polysyllabic keywords for this.