Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
(Removed old talk) |
(→Browse source link doesn't work) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
** Compiling | ** Compiling | ||
** How to contribute | ** How to contribute | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''--[[User:Seilerm|Seilerm]] 18:35, 4 December 2006 (CET)''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think this wiki, as this is the home of EiffelStudio, should be customized. | ||
| + | How others do it: | ||
| + | http://www.mono-project.com | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''--[[User:Manus|manus]] 22:47, 4 December 2006 (CET)''' | ||
| + | I agree with Martin. Does anyone have the experience for doing the customization? | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Browse source link doesn't work == | ||
| + | It's pointing to origo. | ||
| + | --[[User:Colin-adams|Colin-adams]] 13:41, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is now fixed. --[[User:Manus|manus]] 17:28, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:28, 6 October 2012
--Juliant 23:22, 28 November 2006 (CET)
Just that it doesn't get forgotten and since someone of the admins has to change navigation I post this here again (From Talk:New Main Page):
Also a new page logo (at least withouth the white border) and a new navigation would look better. I would split the navigation to a 'normal navigation' part and a 'developers' part (see below).
Navigation proposal:
- Navigation
- Home (not sure if this is needed because the logo alredy points to the main page)
- Categories
- Downloads
- Version history
- FAQ
- Mailing lists
- Eiffel links
- Developement
- Recent changes
- Changelog of 6.x
- SVN repository
- Compiling
- How to contribute
--Seilerm 18:35, 4 December 2006 (CET)
I think this wiki, as this is the home of EiffelStudio, should be customized. How others do it: http://www.mono-project.com
--manus 22:47, 4 December 2006 (CET) I agree with Martin. Does anyone have the experience for doing the customization?
Browse source link doesn't work
It's pointing to origo. --Colin-adams 13:41, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
It is now fixed. --manus 17:28, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
