Difference between revisions of "Talk:Forget / Keep Mechanism"
Colin-adams (Talk | contribs) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Ouch, this seems to produce many problems. Specially the introduction of all these parameters for types. Also, I am not sure that this approach is sound and modular. It also looks difficult to teach. --[[User:Schoelle|Schoelle]] 15:45, 21 February 2007 (CET) | Ouch, this seems to produce many problems. Specially the introduction of all these parameters for types. Also, I am not sure that this approach is sound and modular. It also looks difficult to teach. --[[User:Schoelle|Schoelle]] 15:45, 21 February 2007 (CET) | ||
| − | Try ECMA instead - it eliminates catcalls. | + | Try ECMA instead - it eliminates catcalls. --[[User:Colin-adams|Colin-adams]] 14:48, 21 February 2007 (CET) |
Revision as of 07:54, 21 February 2007
Ouch, this seems to produce many problems. Specially the introduction of all these parameters for types. Also, I am not sure that this approach is sound and modular. It also looks difficult to teach. --Schoelle 15:45, 21 February 2007 (CET)
Try ECMA instead - it eliminates catcalls. --Colin-adams 14:48, 21 February 2007 (CET)
