Difference between revisions of "SCOOP-A3: Compiler adaptation"

m (Turned user names into links)
m (Added some details)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
Team: [[User:Alexander Kogtenkov|Alexander Kogtenkov]], [[User:Ted|Ted]]
 
Team: [[User:Alexander Kogtenkov|Alexander Kogtenkov]], [[User:Ted|Ted]]
  
* Parsing is already taken care of
+
* '''Parser'''
* Code generation closely connected with work on the scheduler (A1, A2)
+
** Support only separate type declarations (exclude separate class declarations).
* Validity rules are important; part of the challenge is to turn the SCOOP type system
+
** Provide syntax to refer to the processors.
  (devised by Piotr Nienaltowski) into compiler verifications and meaningful error messages.
+
** Take into account the possibility to use anchors.
 +
* '''Type checking''' introduces new
 +
** Conformance rules that affect type system
 +
** Validity rules that require good description of errors
 +
* '''Code generation''' is closely connected with work on the scheduler (A1, A2) and should target
 +
** bytecode
 +
** C code
 +
** CIL code

Revision as of 02:58, 5 June 2010

Construction.png Not Ready for Review: This Page is Under Development!

Team: Alexander Kogtenkov, Ted

  • Parser
    • Support only separate type declarations (exclude separate class declarations).
    • Provide syntax to refer to the processors.
    • Take into account the possibility to use anchors.
  • Type checking introduces new
    • Conformance rules that affect type system
    • Validity rules that require good description of errors
  • Code generation is closely connected with work on the scheduler (A1, A2) and should target
    • bytecode
    • C code
    • CIL code