DynamicTypeSet

CAT-Call freeness detection algorithms

Finding out, whether any given Eiffel system contains a CAT call is undecidable. A CAT call finding algorithm will thus make one or both of the following error kinds:

• Kind A: Report a system that has no CAT-call as NOT CAT-call free.
• Kind B: Report a system containing CAT-calls as CAT-call free.

Algorithms making errors of kind B are of no use. An algorithm that only makes errors of kind A leads to type safety, but may be useless if it makes too many (the trivial algorithm, that reports every Eiffel system as NOT CAT call free makes no errors of Kind B but is completely useless). The goal is thus to find the maximal subclass of the class of CAT-call free Eiffel systems that is decidable and fast enough to be used in practice.

Dynamic type set algorithm

The Dynamic type set algorithm (DTSA) as defined in ETL2 (combined with a system validity check) seems to make no errors of kind B (it remains to be proven) but certainly of kind A. By showing some of these errors we try to show what impact the DTSA has to the Eiffel language. The following system will be used for examples:

class
   LIST_ANY
feature
   put (i: ANY) is
      do
         item := i
      end
   item: ANY
end

class
   LIST_STRING
inherit
   LIST_ANY
      redefine put, item end
feature
   put (i: STRING) is
      do
         i.to_lower
      end	
   item: STRING
end

can make two kinds of errors

But it is easy to come up with an algorithm that detects for a subset of all CAT-call free Eiffel systems that they are CAT-call free 
  * detects a subset of all CAT-call free

But for some systems it is easy to show, that they are CAT call free.

The challenge is thus to find the So DTSA cannot do that, it will correctly declare some Eiffel systems as CAT call free