Difference between revisions of "Assertion Settings"

m (Introduction)
m (Critics)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
* System
 
* System
  
==Critics==
+
==Proposal==
 
A user can specify whether the assertions of a given kind are checked on a per class basis.  
 
A user can specify whether the assertions of a given kind are checked on a per class basis.  
  

Revision as of 15:41, 17 October 2006

Author: Matthias Konrad

Introduction

The Eiffel Language specifies several assertion types:

  • Preconditions
  • Postconditions
  • Invariants
  • Loop variants
  • Checks

In theory these assertions should be checked all the time. In practice, especially when working with huge systems, this is not possible. (Quite often it is not even possible during the testing phase of the system.) It is thus nessecary to decide which assertions should be tested.

It is not sufficient to just enable or disable a certain assertion kind for the whole system. Large systems are composed of smaller parts and reused components (like the base library). These are typically tested independently (unit level testing). It should thus be possible to disable assertion testing on the tested parts and enable it on the other parts.

This article criticizes the way in which In EiffelStudio the user has to decide which assertions need to be checked. He can do this on various levels (for each assertion kind):

  • Class
  • Cluster
  • Library
  • System

Proposal

A user can specify whether the assertions of a given kind are checked on a per class basis.


When the user specifies the assertions for a class he expresses a certain level of trust or mistrust towards it. When he enables invariant checking for a class he is not sure wether the specified invariants really hold, so they need to be checked. The same thing is true for loop variants, postconditions and checks. Whereas for preconditions there is different. When precondition checking is enabled the user mistrusts all the clients of the class.

  1. He might not trust the callers of the class, so the preconditions of this class need to be checked.
  2. Or he might not trust the class to hold the preconditions required by features it calls, so all the preconditions of the features called by this class need to be checked.

The current version of EiffelStudio uses the first approach. When the user indeed mistrusts that the class holds the preconditions of the feature it calls, he needs to enable precondition checking for all the called classes. This will result in a big slow down of the system.

Default settings

When a user creates a new project from scratch, precondition checking is enabled for all the classes in the system. All the other assertion kinds are disabled. First users of EiffelStudio might be very surprised that they never run into any invariant or postcondition violations.

A common pattern for assertion

One would typically completely trust a class from a library provided by a third party and dissable all kinds of assertion checks on the whole library. On the other side