Team: Alexander Kogtenkov, Ted

Summary

• Parser
  • Support only separate type declarations (exclude separate class declarations).
  • Provide syntax to refer to the processors (not supported in 6.7).
  • Take into account the possibility to use anchors.
• Type checking introduces new
  • Conformance rules that affect type system
  • Validity rules that require good description of errors
• Code generation is closely connected with work on the scheduler (A1, A2) and should target
  • bytecode
  • C code
  • CIL code

Decisions

1. Syntax
   • Drop support of separate classes, only separate types are supported.
   • Separate mark is allowed not only for class types, but also for other types.
2. Semantics
   • Default formal generic constraint is detachable separate ANY.
   • Formal generic is considered non-separate if at least one constraint is not separate, otherwise it is considered separate.
3. Code generation
   • Separate and non-separate class types are generated separately, i.e. ANY and separate ANY get different code.
   • Generic derivations with separate and non-separate generics are generated separately, i.e. ARRAY [G] and ARRAY [separate G] get different code.

Open questions

• Shall separate types be supported in CECIL? If yes, how this is done?

Progress