Difference between revisions of "Talk:Forget / Keep Mechanism"
m |
Colin-adams (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Ouch, this seems to produce many problems. Specially the introduction of all these parameters for types. Also, I am not sure that this approach is sound and modular. It also looks difficult to teach. --[[User:Schoelle|Schoelle]] 15:45, 21 February 2007 (CET) | Ouch, this seems to produce many problems. Specially the introduction of all these parameters for types. Also, I am not sure that this approach is sound and modular. It also looks difficult to teach. --[[User:Schoelle|Schoelle]] 15:45, 21 February 2007 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Try ECMA instead - it eliminates catcalls. | ||
Revision as of 06:48, 21 February 2007
Ouch, this seems to produce many problems. Specially the introduction of all these parameters for types. Also, I am not sure that this approach is sound and modular. It also looks difficult to teach. --Schoelle 15:45, 21 February 2007 (CET)
Try ECMA instead - it eliminates catcalls.
