Difference between revisions of "CA Library Implementation"
(CA_CODE_ANALYZER interface) |
(→Command-line Interface) |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
== Command-line Interface == | == Command-line Interface == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The whole command-line functionality of the code analyzer is located in the class <e>{EWB_CODE_ANALYSIS}</e>. It is located in the ''tty'' cluster of ''EVE''. <e>{EWB_CODE_ANALYSIS}</e> is invoked by <e>{ES}</e>, the root class for the ''batch'' (command-line) version of EiffelStudio. In <e>{ES}</e>, the invocation looks as follows: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <e> | ||
+ | elseif option.is_equal ("-code-analysis") then | ||
+ | l_at_args := arguments_in_range (current_option + 1, argument_count) | ||
+ | current_option := argument_count + 1 | ||
+ | create {EWB_CODE_ANALYSIS} command.make_with_arguments (l_at_args) | ||
+ | </e> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Any command-line arguments after ''-code-analysis'' are passed on to <e>{EWB_CODE_ANALYSIS}</e>. This class, in its creation procedure, processes the arguments as described in [[User:Stefan/Code_Analysis/Command Line Usage|Command Line Usage]]. Classes that were passed as command-line arguments are added to the analyzer. Then the actual execution happens in the procedure <e>execute</e>. <e>EWB_CODE_ANALYSIS</e> of course uses the ''code_analysis'' library and the previously described interface of <e>CA_CODE_ANALYZER</e>. After analysis a list of rule violations is output to the command-line. In the code it looks like this: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <e> | ||
+ | across l_code_analyzer.rule_violations as l_vlist loop | ||
+ | if not l_vlist.item.is_empty then | ||
+ | l_has_violations := True | ||
+ | -- Always sort the rule violations by the class they are referring to. | ||
+ | output_window.add (ca_messages.cmd_class + l_vlist.key.name + "':%N") | ||
+ | |||
+ | -- See `{CA_RULE_VIOLATION}.is_less' for information on the sorting. | ||
+ | across l_vlist.item as ic loop | ||
+ | l_rule_name := ic.item.rule.title | ||
+ | l_rule_id := ic.item.rule.id | ||
+ | if attached ic.item.location as l_loc then | ||
+ | l_line := ic.item.location.line.out | ||
+ | l_col := ic.item.location.column.out | ||
+ | output_window.add (" (" + l_line + ":" + l_col + "): " | ||
+ | + l_rule_name + " (" + l_rule_id + "): ") | ||
+ | else -- No location attached. Print without location. | ||
+ | output_window.add (" " + l_rule_name + " (" + l_rule_id + "): ") | ||
+ | end | ||
+ | ic.item.format_violation_description (output_window) | ||
+ | output_window.add ("%N") | ||
+ | end | ||
+ | end | ||
+ | end | ||
+ | |||
+ | if not l_has_violations then output_window.add (ca_messages.no_issues + "%N") end | ||
+ | </e> |
Revision as of 05:11, 6 March 2014
The code for Code Analysis is located at three different places in the EVE source:
- The framework—the by far largest part, with the rule checking, the rules, the control flow graph functionality, and more—is represented as a library;
- The graphical user interface can be found in the interface cluster of EVE;
- The command-line interface for code analysis is a single class in the tty cluster of EVE.
Contents
code_analysis library
The whole code analysis framework is located in the library code_analysis.
Interface
In this section it is explained from a client view how to use the code analyzer. The code analyzer is represented by the class CA_CODE_ANALYZER
, so a client must have or access an instance of this class. Before the analyzer can be launched all the classes that shall be analyzed must be added using one of the following features. If you use more than one of these commands then the added classes from all commands will be conjoined.
-
{CA_CODE_ANALYZER}.add_whole_system
- Adds all the classes that are part of the current system. Classes of referenced libraries will not be added. So, for example, if your system consists of the classes
MY_MAIN
,MY_BOX
, andMY_ITEM
then these three classes will be added to the list of classes to be analyzed. -
.add_class (a_class: attached CONF_CLASS)
- Adds a single class.
-
.add_classes (a_classes: attached ITERABLE [attached CONF_CLASS])
- Adds a list of classes.
-
.add_cluster (a_cluster: attached CLUSTER_I)
- Adds all classes of a cluster (and all the classes of the sub-clusters recursively).
-
.add_group (a_group: attached CONF_GROUP)
- Adds all classes of a configuration group. An example of a configuration group is a library.
Here are other features which can be called before starting to analyze:
-
{CA_CODE_ANALYZER}.clear_classes_to_analyze
- Removes all classes that have been added to the list of classes to analyze.
-
.add_completed_action (a_action: attached PROCEDURE [ANY, TUPLE [ITERABLE [TUPLE [detachable EXCEPTION, CLASS_C]]]])
- Adds
`a_action'
to the list of procedures that will be called when analysis has completed. The procedures have one argument, a list of exceptions (with the corresponding class). In the case an exception is thrown during analysis the exception is caught by the code analyzer and is added to this list. In the graphical user interface such exceptions would show up as errors at the top of the list of rule violations. -
.add_output_action (a_action: attached PROCEDURE [ANY, TUPLE [READABLE_STRING_GENERAL]])
- Adds
`a_action'
to the procedures that are called for outputting status. The final results (rule violations) are not given to these procedures. These output actions are used by the command-line mode and by the status bar in the GUI. -
is_rule_checkable (a_rule: attached CA_RULE): BOOLEAN
- Tells whether
`a_rule'
will be checked based on the current preferences and based on the current checking scope (whole system or custom set of classes).
Then, to start analyzing simply call {CA_CODE_ANALYZER}.analyze
.
Rule checking
Graphical User Interface
Command-line Interface
The whole command-line functionality of the code analyzer is located in the class {EWB_CODE_ANALYSIS}
. It is located in the tty cluster of EVE. {EWB_CODE_ANALYSIS}
is invoked by {ES}
, the root class for the batch (command-line) version of EiffelStudio. In {ES}
, the invocation looks as follows:
elseif option.is_equal ("-code-analysis") then l_at_args := arguments_in_range (current_option + 1, argument_count) current_option := argument_count + 1 create {EWB_CODE_ANALYSIS} command.make_with_arguments (l_at_args)
Any command-line arguments after -code-analysis are passed on to {EWB_CODE_ANALYSIS}
. This class, in its creation procedure, processes the arguments as described in Command Line Usage. Classes that were passed as command-line arguments are added to the analyzer. Then the actual execution happens in the procedure execute
. EWB_CODE_ANALYSIS
of course uses the code_analysis library and the previously described interface of CA_CODE_ANALYZER
. After analysis a list of rule violations is output to the command-line. In the code it looks like this:
across l_code_analyzer.rule_violations as l_vlist loop if not l_vlist.item.is_empty then l_has_violations := True -- Always sort the rule violations by the class they are referring to. output_window.add (ca_messages.cmd_class + l_vlist.key.name + "':%N") -- See `{CA_RULE_VIOLATION}.is_less' for information on the sorting. across l_vlist.item as ic loop l_rule_name := ic.item.rule.title l_rule_id := ic.item.rule.id if attached ic.item.location as l_loc then l_line := ic.item.location.line.out l_col := ic.item.location.column.out output_window.add (" (" + l_line + ":" + l_col + "): " + l_rule_name + " (" + l_rule_id + "): ") else -- No location attached. Print without location. output_window.add (" " + l_rule_name + " (" + l_rule_id + "): ") end ic.item.format_violation_description (output_window) output_window.add ("%N") end end end if not l_has_violations then output_window.add (ca_messages.no_issues + "%N") end