Difference between revisions of "Talk:Downloads"
Colin-adams (Talk | contribs) (Mac OS X 64-bit binary for 6.2?) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hmm - is the command line compiler really at production level? With all the changes in the interface (move from .ace via .acex to .ecf). I know it is good and stable, but still ... (Bernd) | Hmm - is the command line compiler really at production level? With all the changes in the interface (move from .ace via .acex to .ecf). I know it is good and stable, but still ... (Bernd) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Mac OS X 64-bit binary for 6.2? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I see in the Origo downloads area, that one of the latest downloads is labelled as platform Mac OS X x86_64. However the file name includes solaris, so I assume it is really an x86_64 solaris build. | ||
| + | |||
| + | When will we get a Mac OS X x86_64 build? | ||
| + | --[[User:Colin-adams|Colin-adams]] 05:52, 11 June 2008 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:52, 11 June 2008
Hmm - is the command line compiler really at production level? With all the changes in the interface (move from .ace via .acex to .ecf). I know it is good and stable, but still ... (Bernd)
Mac OS X 64-bit binary for 6.2?
I see in the Origo downloads area, that one of the latest downloads is labelled as platform Mac OS X x86_64. However the file name includes solaris, so I assume it is really an x86_64 solaris build.
When will we get a Mac OS X x86_64 build? --Colin-adams 05:52, 11 June 2008 (PDT)
