Difference between revisions of "Talk:Transactions"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Discussion of the feasibility and desirability of implementing transactional concurrency in Eiffel. | Discussion of the feasibility and desirability of implementing transactional concurrency in Eiffel. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Legacy externals == | ||
+ | Is blocking all threads and executing legacy externals sufficient to ensure correct operation | ||
+ | |||
+ | Is it possible to check for legacy externals within a transaction at runtime | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Implementation performance == | ||
+ | Performance of software transactional memory. | ||
+ | Current implementations of software transactional memory. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Language keywords == | ||
+ | Use a word to define a transaction or a non-transaction | ||
== Examples please == | == Examples please == | ||
I think we need to see some examples (well, I do for one). | I think we need to see some examples (well, I do for one). |
Revision as of 06:52, 9 April 2007
Discussion of the feasibility and desirability of implementing transactional concurrency in Eiffel.
Legacy externals
Is blocking all threads and executing legacy externals sufficient to ensure correct operation
Is it possible to check for legacy externals within a transaction at runtime
Implementation performance
Performance of software transactional memory. Current implementations of software transactional memory.
Language keywords
Use a word to define a transaction or a non-transaction
Examples please
I think we need to see some examples (well, I do for one).