|
|
Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| {{Warning|'''Warning''': Article under development}} | | {{Warning|'''Warning''': Article under development}} |
| | | |
− | ==Introduction== | + | ====Introduction==== |
− | This article discusses issues recently discovered for the following two validity rules:
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | 8.15.7 Validity: ''Conversion Procedure rule'', Validity code: '''VYCP'''<br>
| + | |
− | 8.15.8 Validity: ''Conversion Query rule'', Validity code: '''VYCQ'''
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | ==Examples==
| + | |
− | For the following examples eweasel tests have been created. Their named
| + | |
− | ====Example 1====
| + | |
− | eweasel test: convert-to-current-type
| + | |
− | <code>[eiffel,N]
| + | |
− | class A[G]
| + | |
− | convert
| + | |
− | to_a: {A[G]}
| + | |
− | feature
| + | |
− | to_a: A[G]
| + | |
− | end
| + | |
− | </code>
| + | |
− | The conversion to '''A[G]''' should indeed not be valid because they are conform.
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | The only rule that matters in our case is '''VYCQ(3)'''.
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | What VYCQ(3) asks is the following
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | Is A[ANY] conform to A[G]?
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | As we answer this question clearly with '''no''', the conversion is valid because all the other rules do not object either.
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | ====Example 2====
| + | |
− | eweasel test: convert-to-current-type
| + | |
− | <code>[eiffel,N]
| + | |
− | class A[G]
| + | |
− | convert
| + | |
− | to_a: {A[STRING]}
| + | |
− | feature
| + | |
− | to_a: A[STRING]
| + | |
− | end
| + | |
− | </code>
| + | |
− | In the case where G's actual type parameter is a subtype of STRING the two types are conform again.
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | The interesting rule is again '''VYCQ(3)''':
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | Is A[ANY] conform to A[STRING]?
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | This question is answered with '''no''' too. Therefore the conversion is valid.
| + | |
Revision as of 18:23, 18 January 2007
Warning: Warning: Article under development
Introduction