DynBindModelExamples: Difference between revisions
| Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
====Calculate <math>\beta_{S_2}\left( C_2 \mapsto C_1 \right)</math>==== | ====Calculate <math>\beta_{S_2}\left( C_2 \mapsto C_1 \right)</math>==== | ||
According to the | According to the [[DynBindModel#The_naming_function#Its_definition|definition]] | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\beta_{S_2}\left( C_2 \mapsto C_1 \right) = \emptyset | \beta_{S_2}\left( C_2 \mapsto C_1 \right) = \emptyset | ||
Revision as of 21:14, 9 October 2006
This page shows
Example 1
The system
In this example we are studying a symple system with three classes that contains both renaming and selects:
class C1 feature f1 do ... end g1 do ... end end |
class C2 inherit B rename f1 as f2, g1 as g2 redefine f2, g2 end feature f2 do ... end g2 do ... end end |
class C3 inherit C2 select f1 end C1 redefine f1, g1 select g1 end feature f1 do ... end g1 do ... end end |
This system is defined by:
The naming function
We proceed by calculating the naming function. According to its definition we have to do that incrementaly. Meaning that we first calculate then and finally .
Calculating
Since contains only one class it is sufficient to define . According to the definition:
We can forget about the right part of the union since has no base classes. So we need to calculate: .
This done we calculate:
So we get:
Calculating
We show the calculation of the different (four) parts of the function in separate sections:
Calculate
According to the definition [1]:
Calculate
According to the definition
Calculate
According to the definition:
Lets calculate the left part first:
And now the right part:
So we get:
Calculate
By first calculating:
Next we need to calculate:
So:
And:
By putting the parts together we get:
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Calculating
We will not show the complete construction of but restrict our self to the most interesting part: