DynBindModelExamples: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\mbox{dom}\left(\left\{ l_1 \mapsto r_1, \ldots, l_n \mapsto r_n \right\}\right) = \left\{ l_1, \ldots, l_n \right\} | \mbox{dom}\left(\left\{ l_1 \mapsto r_1, \ldots, l_n \mapsto r_n \right\}\right) = \left\{ l_1, \ldots, l_n \right\} | ||
</math> | </math><p> | ||
This done we calculate: | This done we calculate: | ||
#<math> | #<math> | ||
Revision as of 20:41, 6 October 2006
This page shows
Example 1
The system
In this example we are studying a symple system with three classes that contains both renaming and selects:
class C1 feature f1 do ... end g1 do ... end end |
class C2 inherit B rename f1 as f2, g1 as g2 redefine f2, g2 end feature f2 do ... end g2 do ... end end |
class C3 inherit C2 select f1 end C1 redefine f1, g1 select g1 end feature f1 do ... end g1 do ... end end |
This system is defined by:
The naming function
We proceed by calculating the naming function. According to its definition we have to do that incrementaly. Meaning that we first calculate then and finally .
Since contains only one class it is sufficient to define . According to the definition:
We can forget about the right part of the union since has no base classes. So we need to calculate: . To do so we give a little reminder on the identity and domain operators:
This done we calculate: