DynBindModel: Difference between revisions
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
<math>\alpha_S \left( A \right) \left( 1 \right) </math> Gives the base class of the first parent part of class A. | <math>\alpha_S \left( A \right) \left( 1 \right) </math> Gives the base class of the first parent part of class A. | ||
<math>\sigma_S : \mathrm{TYPE} \rightarrow \mathrm{NAME}</math> | |||
Revision as of 22:41, 1 October 2006
Motivation:
Eiffels dynamic binding is somewhat more complex than that of other languages. Its structure is still very simple and can be described by giving the relation:
Relation γ contains both the static and dynamic binding part of the language. In the following feature:
f (a: ANY)
do
print (a.out)
end
The static binding part of call a.out can be decribed as:
Namely an evaluation of γ with a tuple containing the static type of the call and the name. The result of this is a function. This function will be evaluated at runtime and yield the right feature according to the dynamic type of a.
In the rest of this text, the we will show how to construct the relation γ based on any given eiffel system.
Some fundamentals
We introduce the operator as the "ancestor of" and as "descendant of" operator.
Without loss of generality we can say that any Eiffel system is a set of classes such that if . In practice class will allways be class ANY but this is not of importance here.
The relation
Gives information about the features declared int the classes of system S. This relation is explicitely given by the unfolded form of all the classes of S.
gives the renamings of the first parent part of class A.
Gives the base class of the first parent part of class A.