Difference between revisions of "Talk:Syntax checking/SRS"
(→Manus) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Some people thaught that an timing-based parser would be better. Who is of the same opionion? Please use this discussion, as we need to finalize the specifications soon. | Some people thaught that an timing-based parser would be better. Who is of the same opionion? Please use this discussion, as we need to finalize the specifications soon. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:jabernet|Janick]] May 5th 2006 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 12:29, 5 May 2006
Please give some feedback regarding SRS so far
Manus
It is great. For the syntax validity, create an instance of EIFFEL_PARSER with the AST_NULL_FACTORY for the factory. That way it is quite efficient for the parsing.
manus 19:03, 2 May 2006 (CEST)
Manu, thanks for the feedback and hints.
Some people thaught that an timing-based parser would be better. Who is of the same opionion? Please use this discussion, as we need to finalize the specifications soon.
Janick May 5th 2006 (CEST)
