Talk:Internationalization/file format: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
=Comments= | =Comments= | ||
So, as you can see I found few positive aspects for XML and few negative for PO. I don't | So, as you can see I found few positive aspects for XML and few negative for PO. I don't want to advertise the PO format, so if you know/find aspects that I haven't mentioned, don't hesitate to add them! [[User:Etienner|Etienner]] 17:09, 28 April 2006 (CEST) | ||
Licensing. We will have to write our own .po parser because ISE will want copyright assignent (or at the least BSD licensing) & we can't just use gettext because there is probably no way to make this an optional addon. [[User:Leo|Leo]] 19:29, 28 April 2006 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 17:29, 28 April 2006
Format proposals
About our today's talk on file formats, you can read the [XML page on Wikipedia]
Parallel Wikis
I think that the wiki for the project should be only one, we are allowed to put test versions or proposals... (Martino)
I agree. We should probably stick to one wiki because it will get confusing otherwise - sorry, Carlo. Leo 01:52, 27 April 2006 (CEST)
Comments
So, as you can see I found few positive aspects for XML and few negative for PO. I don't want to advertise the PO format, so if you know/find aspects that I haven't mentioned, don't hesitate to add them! Etienner 17:09, 28 April 2006 (CEST)
Licensing. We will have to write our own .po parser because ISE will want copyright assignent (or at the least BSD licensing) & we can't just use gettext because there is probably no way to make this an optional addon. Leo 19:29, 28 April 2006 (CEST)