Difference between revisions of "Talk:Internationalization"
(→Useful link) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What is the difference between PO and MO files? | What is the difference between PO and MO files? | ||
--[[User:Manus|manus]] 21:35, 4 May 2006 (CEST) | --[[User:Manus|manus]] 21:35, 4 May 2006 (CEST) | ||
+ | :PO (Portable Object) is the human readable format, with keywords and all the white-spaces; MO (Machine object) are intended to be read by computers and have no formatting. [[User:Trosim|Trosim]] 21:49, 4 May 2006 (CEST) | ||
Cooles Logo | Cooles Logo | ||
Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
[http://www.eiffelzone.com/esd/eutils/index.html a project for SmartEiffel that has a class for Printf-like STRING formatting with positional indexes] | [http://www.eiffelzone.com/esd/eutils/index.html a project for SmartEiffel that has a class for Printf-like STRING formatting with positional indexes] | ||
+ | |||
+ | About object globality see ''OO Software Construction 2nd edition'', B. Meyer; chap. 18 ''Global objects and constants'' |
Latest revision as of 14:15, 4 May 2006
What is the difference between PO and MO files? --manus 21:35, 4 May 2006 (CEST)
- PO (Portable Object) is the human readable format, with keywords and all the white-spaces; MO (Machine object) are intended to be read by computers and have no formatting. Trosim 21:49, 4 May 2006 (CEST)
Cooles Logo Bernd
Useful link
Here is the approach of GNU for internationalization.
a project for SmartEiffel that has a class for Printf-like STRING formatting with positional indexes
About object globality see OO Software Construction 2nd edition, B. Meyer; chap. 18 Global objects and constants