Difference between revisions of "SCOOP-A3: Compiler adaptation"
m (Introduced several new sections with more details) |
m (→Decisions: Added notes on CECIL and storable) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
#* Separate and non-separate class types are generated separately, i.e. <e>ANY</e> and <e>separate ANY</e> get different code. | #* Separate and non-separate class types are generated separately, i.e. <e>ANY</e> and <e>separate ANY</e> get different code. | ||
#* Generic derivations with separate and non-separate generics are generated separately, i.e. <e>ARRAY [G]</e> and <e>ARRAY [separate G]</e> get different code. | #* Generic derivations with separate and non-separate generics are generated separately, i.e. <e>ARRAY [G]</e> and <e>ARRAY [separate G]</e> get different code. | ||
+ | # User interface | ||
+ | #* CECIL does not support separate types in [[EiffelStudio_6.7_Releases|6.7]]. | ||
+ | #* Storable does not support separate types in [[EiffelStudio_6.7_Releases|6.7]]. | ||
+ | |||
= Open questions = | = Open questions = | ||
− | * Shall separate types be supported in CECIL? If yes, how | + | * Shall separate types be supported in CECIL? If yes, how is this done? |
+ | |||
= Progress = | = Progress = | ||
{| border="1" style="border-collapse: collapse; border-width: 1px; border-style: solid;" | {| border="1" style="border-collapse: collapse; border-width: 1px; border-style: solid;" |
Latest revision as of 06:18, 25 August 2010
Team: Alexander Kogtenkov, Ted
Contents
Summary
- Parser
- Support only separate type declarations (exclude separate class declarations).
- Provide syntax to refer to the processors (not supported in 6.7).
- Take into account the possibility to use anchors.
- Type checking introduces new
- Conformance rules that affect type system
- Validity rules that require good description of errors
- Code generation is closely connected with work on the scheduler (A1, A2) and should target
- bytecode
- C code
- CIL code
Decisions
- Syntax
- Drop support of separate classes, only separate types are supported.
- Separate mark is allowed not only for class types, but also for other types.
- Semantics
- Default formal generic constraint is
detachable separate ANY
. - Formal generic is considered non-separate if at least one constraint is not separate, otherwise it is considered separate.
- Default formal generic constraint is
- Code generation
- User interface
Open questions
- Shall separate types be supported in CECIL? If yes, how is this done?
Progress
Functionality | Status |
---|---|
Syntax for separate types | rev#84252 |
Separate status in conformance tests | |
Validity rules specific to separate types | |
Bytecode generation | |
C code generation | |
CIL code generation |