Difference between revisions of "Talk:New CAT call"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ''The most obvious observation is, that this weakens the new non-void typing mechanism, it is now possible to pass Void to feature f of class B2. This was probably not the intention of the programmer.'' - I do not understand this comment. Changing a:ANY into a:?STRING looks like a standard contravariant redefinition to me. Such redefinitions are sound. | + | ''The most obvious observation is, that this weakens the new non-void typing mechanism, it is now possible to pass Void to feature f of class B2. This was probably not the intention of the programmer.'' - I do not understand this comment. Changing a:ANY into a:?STRING looks like a standard contravariant redefinition to me. Such redefinitions are sound. [[User:schoelle]] |
Revision as of 23:57, 7 November 2006
The most obvious observation is, that this weakens the new non-void typing mechanism, it is now possible to pass Void to feature f of class B2. This was probably not the intention of the programmer. - I do not understand this comment. Changing a:ANY into a:?STRING looks like a standard contravariant redefinition to me. Such redefinitions are sound. User:schoelle
