Difference between revisions of "Replication"

(Three cases of conforming repeated inheritance)
(Three cases of non-conforming repeated inheritance)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
inherit {NONE}
 
inherit {NONE}
 
   B
 
   B
       rename f as f_1, g as g_1 end
+
       rename f as f1, g as g1 end
 
   B
 
   B
       rename f as f_2, g as g_2 end
+
       rename f as f2, g as g2 end
 
feature
 
feature
 
end     
 
end     
 
</code>
 
</code>
  
And an informal description of the semantics: An object of class D1 contains two physical attributes (f_1 and f_2). A call to feature g_1 results in f_1 being incremented and a call to g_2 increments f_2.
+
And an informal description of the semantics: An object of class D1 contains two physical attributes (f1 and f2). A call to feature g1 results in f1 being incremented and a call to g2 increments f2.
  
 
Lets do the same for D2:
 
Lets do the same for D2:
Line 44: Line 44:
 
inherit {NONE}
 
inherit {NONE}
 
   B
 
   B
       rename g as g_1 end
+
       rename g as g1 end
 
   B
 
   B
       rename g as g_2 end
+
       rename g as g2 end
 
feature
 
feature
 
end     
 
end     
 
</code>
 
</code>
  
An object of class D2 contains one physical attribute (f). A call to either g_1 or g_2 results in f being incremented.
+
An object of class D2 contains one physical attribute (f). A call to either g1 or g2 results in f being incremented.
  
 
Class D3 should be rejected by the compiler:
 
Class D3 should be rejected by the compiler:
Line 59: Line 59:
 
inherit {NONE}
 
inherit {NONE}
 
   B
 
   B
       rename f as f_1 end
+
       rename f as f1 end
 
   B
 
   B
       rename f as f_2 end
+
       rename f as f2 end
 
feature
 
feature
 
end     
 
end     
 
</code>
 
</code>
  
Since an object of class D3 would have two physical attributes f_1 and f_2, it is not clear which one g should increment.
+
Since an object of class D3 would have two physical attributes f1 and f2, it is not clear which one g should increment.
  
 
====Three cases of conforming repeated inheritance====
 
====Three cases of conforming repeated inheritance====

Revision as of 09:40, 25 August 2006


Work in progress!

We start with some very basic examples, for this we consider all the classes not to be inherited by ANY.

Example set

Basic cases of direct repeated inheritance

The following set of example will base on class B:

class
   B
feature
   f: INTEGER
   g
      do 
         f := f + 1 
      end
end

Three cases of non-conforming repeated inheritance

Lets have look at D1 that repeatedly inherits from B:

class
   D1
inherit {NONE}
   B
      rename f as f1, g as g1 end
   B
      rename f as f2, g as g2 end
feature
end

And an informal description of the semantics: An object of class D1 contains two physical attributes (f1 and f2). A call to feature g1 results in f1 being incremented and a call to g2 increments f2.

Lets do the same for D2:

class
   D2
inherit {NONE}
   B
      rename g as g1 end
   B
      rename g as g2 end
feature
end

An object of class D2 contains one physical attribute (f). A call to either g1 or g2 results in f being incremented.

Class D3 should be rejected by the compiler:

class
   D3
inherit {NONE}
   B
      rename f as f1 end
   B
      rename f as f2 end
feature
end

Since an object of class D3 would have two physical attributes f1 and f2, it is not clear which one g should increment.

Three cases of conforming repeated inheritance

Lets look now at different variants of class DC1. They looks exactly as class D1 except that it inherits conforming from B (twice) and therefore need to solve the conflicts between f_1-f_2 and g_1-g_2 by selecting. Let DC1_f

Even though the following examples contain conforming inheritance, we will start by investigating their semantics in the case where static and dynamic type are equal.