WEL Hook: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:WEL]] | [[Category:WEL]] | ||
==There 3 different kinds of hooks now. Which one is better?== | ==There are 3 different kinds of hooks now. Which one is better?== | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Problems: | Problems: | ||
1. | 1. Does not work with pointer button pressed and when pointer moves outside the same process. | ||
2. Cursor will changed outside the same process. | 2. Cursor will be changed outside the same process. | ||
* 2.Wel hook with low level mouse hook (WH_MOUSE_LL) and normal hook (WH_MOUSE). | * 2.Wel hook with low level mouse hook (WH_MOUSE_LL) and normal hook (WH_MOUSE). | ||
Problems: | Problems: | ||
1. Cursor will changed outside the same process. | 1. Cursor will be changed outside the same process. | ||
2. Low level mouse hook not work on Windows 98. | 2. Low level mouse hook does not work on Windows 98. | ||
* 3.Wel hook with journal record hook (WH_JOURNALRECORD) and normal hook (WH_MOUSE). | * 3.Wel hook with journal record hook (WH_JOURNALRECORD) and normal hook (WH_MOUSE). | ||
Problems: | Problems: | ||
1. Cursor will | 1. Cursor will change between our application's cursor and another processes cursor. | ||
2. Low level mouse | 2. Low level mouse hooks do not work on Windows 98. | ||
* 4.Wel hook (heavy capture) and Windows setCapture (normal capture) working at the same time. | * 4.Wel hook (heavy capture) and Windows setCapture (normal capture) working at the same time. | ||
Problems: | Problems: | ||
1. | 1. Does not work when pointer button pressed and pointer move outside the same process EXCEPT the first time. | ||
Advantage: | Advantage: | ||
1. Actually most cases | 1. Actually, in most cases users only care about the first time when pointer button pressed. | ||
* Final words: | * Final words: | ||
If I can find a way to stop Windows | If I can find a way to stop Windows from changing mouse cursor, I think "2" is perfect. (But is still not supported by Windows98) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:09, 7 April 2006
There are 3 different kinds of hooks now. Which one is better?
- 1.Old one in svn. Use WM_MOUSE.
Problems: 1. Does not work with pointer button pressed and when pointer moves outside the same process. 2. Cursor will be changed outside the same process.
- 2.Wel hook with low level mouse hook (WH_MOUSE_LL) and normal hook (WH_MOUSE).
Problems: 1. Cursor will be changed outside the same process. 2. Low level mouse hook does not work on Windows 98.
- 3.Wel hook with journal record hook (WH_JOURNALRECORD) and normal hook (WH_MOUSE).
Problems: 1. Cursor will change between our application's cursor and another processes cursor. 2. Low level mouse hooks do not work on Windows 98.
- 4.Wel hook (heavy capture) and Windows setCapture (normal capture) working at the same time.
Problems: 1. Does not work when pointer button pressed and pointer move outside the same process EXCEPT the first time. Advantage: 1. Actually, in most cases users only care about the first time when pointer button pressed.
- Final words:
If I can find a way to stop Windows from changing mouse cursor, I think "2" is perfect. (But is still not supported by Windows98)