SCOOP-A3: Compiler adaptation: Difference between revisions

From EiffelStudio: an EiffelSoftware project
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m Turned user names into links
m Added some details
Line 4: Line 4:
Team: [[User:Alexander Kogtenkov|Alexander Kogtenkov]], [[User:Ted|Ted]]
Team: [[User:Alexander Kogtenkov|Alexander Kogtenkov]], [[User:Ted|Ted]]


* Parsing is already taken care of
* '''Parser'''
* Code generation closely connected with work on the scheduler (A1, A2)
** Support only separate type declarations (exclude separate class declarations).
* Validity rules are important; part of the challenge is to turn the SCOOP type system
** Provide syntax to refer to the processors.
  (devised by Piotr Nienaltowski) into compiler verifications and meaningful error messages.
** Take into account the possibility to use anchors.
* '''Type checking''' introduces new
** Conformance rules that affect type system
** Validity rules that require good description of errors
* '''Code generation''' is closely connected with work on the scheduler (A1, A2) and should target
** bytecode
** C code
** CIL code

Revision as of 10:58, 5 June 2010

Not Ready for Review: This Page is Under Development!

Team: Alexander Kogtenkov, Ted

  • Parser
    • Support only separate type declarations (exclude separate class declarations).
    • Provide syntax to refer to the processors.
    • Take into account the possibility to use anchors.
  • Type checking introduces new
    • Conformance rules that affect type system
    • Validity rules that require good description of errors
  • Code generation is closely connected with work on the scheduler (A1, A2) and should target
    • bytecode
    • C code
    • CIL code