Difference between revisions of "Testing Tool (Architecture)"

(Initial description of tester system and communication)
(Added "See also" section)
Line 30: Line 30:
 
* executor per machine/processor?
 
* executor per machine/processor?
 
* text based/object base communication?
 
* text based/object base communication?
 +
 +
== See also ==
 +
 +
* [[Testing Tool (Specification)]]

Revision as of 13:20, 12 June 2008


Test system architecture

  • separate system for executing tests
  • system is only responsible for running tests, without determine whether a test fails or not -> compiling and launching system is done by tool, which is also oracle
  • tests are compiled up to degree 3 in development system, so user can edit tests like normal classes, but do not affect resulting binary
  • test referenced by root class of development system will be compiled anyway, this way we can also run tests in debugger
  • in CDD: test system is implicit target (does not have to be in ecf) which inherits from development target, test target simply defines new root class/feature
  • re-use development EIFGEN (copy) so test system does not need to compile from scratch?

Communication between tool and test executor

Protocol

From tool to executor

  • name(s) of test to execute
  • quit

From executor to tool

  • test result
  • text output produced by test
  • exception details (type, tag, feature, class? occurred during set up, test, tear down?)
  • call stack for exception

Open questions

  • executor per machine/processor?
  • text based/object base communication?

See also