Difference between revisions of "CddBranch"
(→Schedule) |
(→Summary) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Summary == | == Summary == | ||
| − | CDD | + | The Contract Driven Development (CDD) Extension to EiffelStudio provides support for |
| − | + | * Automatic Test Case Extraction (Test cases are extracted from failures without intervention from the user) | |
| − | + | * Integration of manually written unit test cases | |
| + | |||
| + | CDD is undisruptive to the development process of the user. If you have questions, feedback or would like to report a bug please visit (TODO: inser forum link here) | ||
Revision as of 03:20, 27 January 2008
Contents
Summary
The Contract Driven Development (CDD) Extension to EiffelStudio provides support for
- Automatic Test Case Extraction (Test cases are extracted from failures without intervention from the user)
- Integration of manually written unit test cases
CDD is undisruptive to the development process of the user. If you have questions, feedback or would like to report a bug please visit (TODO: inser forum link here)
Play Video!
Old Documentation
At this point there is only outdated documentation. It is available from CddOldDocumentation
Testing
Development (Todo's):
Schedule
- 04.01.2008: Final experiment definition (questions to ask, how to conduct experiment)
- 08.01.2008: Finalized list of features to go in release (including logging and log submission)
- 27.01.2008: Beta 1 (feature complete version online)
- 04.02.2008: Beta 2 (designated testers test release, # > 3)
- 11.02.2008: Beta tester feedback in
- 18.02.2008: Final CDD release for experiment online
- 19.02.2008: Initial Questionnaire
- 25.03.2008: Midterm Questionnaire
- 19.05.2008: Final Questionnaire
- 20.05.2008: Having all data
- 06.06.2008: Finished analysis
Stefans Master Plan
- MA Start ca 17.12.2007
- MA End ca 17.6.2008
- Testing the tester
- System level test for CDD (incl. framework)
- Recreating existing unit test suite with CDD
- Large scale validation of CDD
- Info 4 and/or Software Engineering
- Questions
- Does testing (manual/extracted) increase developer productivity?
- How many tests do ppl end up with (manual/extracted)?
- ...
Specifications
Things we need from estudio
- Invariants should be checked during debugging equally to pre- and post conditions (they could also be visualised in the flat view the same way like pre- and post conditions are)
- The information whether some call is a creation call or a normal routine call (Not sure if this is really necessary, what if we assume every call to some creation procedure is always a creation call?)
- Support for multiple open targets
