WEL Hook - Revision history

King at 19:09, 7 April 2006

2006-04-07T19:09:24Z

King at 19:08, 7 April 2006

2006-04-07T19:08:27Z

Manus at 05:07, 4 April 2006

2006-04-04T05:07:19Z

Manus at 04:43, 4 April 2006

2006-04-04T04:43:33Z

New page

[[Category:WEL]]
[[Category:Library]]

==There 3 different kinds of hooks now. Which one is better?==

* 1.Old one in svn. Use WM_MOUSE.

Problems:
1. Not work when pointer button pressed and pointer move outside the same process.
2. Cursor will changed outside the same process.

* 2.Wel hook with low level mouse hook (WH_MOUSE_LL) and normal hook (WH_MOUSE).

Problems:
1. Cursor will changed outside the same process.
2. Low level mouse hook not work on Windows 98.

* 3.Wel hook with journal record hook (WH_JOURNALRECORD) and normal hook (WH_MOUSE).

Problems:
1. Cursor will changing between our application's cursor and other process cursor.
2. Low level mouse hook not work on Windows 98.

* 4.Wel hook (heavy capture) and Windows setCapture (normal capture) working at the same time.

Problems:
1. Not work when pointer button pressed and pointer move outside the same process EXCEPT the first time.
Advantage:
1. Actually most cases user only care about first time when pointer button pressed.

* Final words:

If I can find a way to stop Windows change mousr cursor, I think "2" it's perfect. (But it still not support Windows98)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:09, 7 April 2006
Line 31:		Line 31:
	* Final words:		* Final words:

−	If I can find a way to stop Windows from changing ~~mousr~~ cursor, I think "2" is perfect. (But is still not supported by Windows98)	+	If I can find a way to stop Windows from changing mouse cursor, I think "2" is perfect. (But is still not supported by Windows98)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:07, 4 April 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Category:WEL]]		[[Category:WEL]]
−	~~[[Category:Library]]~~

	==There 3 different kinds of hooks now. Which one is better?==		==There 3 different kinds of hooks now. Which one is better?==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Category:WEL]]
-==There 3 different kinds of hooks now. Which one is better?==
+==There are 3 different kinds of hooks now. Which one is better?==
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
      Problems:
-. Not work when pointer button pressed and pointer move outside the same process.
+. Does not work with pointer button pressed and when pointer moves outside the same process.
-. Cursor will changed outside the same process.
+. Cursor will be changed outside the same process.
 * 2.Wel hook with low level mouse hook (WH_MOUSE_LL) and normal hook (WH_MOUSE).
      Problems:
-. Cursor will changed outside the same process.
+. Cursor will be changed outside the same process.
-. Low level mouse hook not work on Windows 98.
+. Low level mouse hook does not work on Windows 98.
 * 3.Wel hook with journal record hook (WH_JOURNALRECORD) and normal hook (WH_MOUSE).
      Problems:
-. Cursor will changing between our application's cursor and other process cursor.
+. Cursor will change between our application's cursor and another processes cursor.
-. Low level mouse hook not work on Windows 98.
+. Low level mouse hooks do not work on Windows 98.
 * 4.Wel hook (heavy capture) and Windows setCapture (normal capture) working at the same time.
      Problems:
-. Not work when pointer button pressed and pointer move outside the same process EXCEPT the first time.
+. Does not work when pointer button pressed and pointer move outside the same process EXCEPT the first time.
      Advantage:
-. Actually most cases user only care about first time when pointer button pressed.
+. Actually, in most cases users only care about the first time when pointer button pressed.
 * Final words:
-     If I can find a way to stop Windows change mousr cursor, I think "2" it's perfect. (But it still not support Windows98)
+     If I can find a way to stop Windows from changing mousr cursor, I think "2" is perfect. (But is still not supported by Windows98)