Talk:ECMA Implementation - Revision history

Peter gummer at 14:09, 14 May 2007

2007-05-14T14:09:57Z

Alexander Kogtenkov: Cosmetics

2007-05-14T11:42:00Z

Cosmetics

Alexander Kogtenkov: Added a note on expanded semantics item

2007-05-14T11:40:53Z

Added a note on expanded semantics item

Alexander Kogtenkov at 11:36, 14 May 2007

2007-05-14T11:36:37Z

Peter gummer at 08:23, 14 May 2007

2007-05-14T08:23:36Z

New page

--[[User:Peter gummer|Peter gummer]] 10:23, 14 May 2007 (CEST) The third complex task, "Other New expanded semantic": does that mean conformance of expanded generic parameters?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:09, 14 May 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	--[[User:Alexander Kogtenkov\|Alexander Kogtenkov]] 13:42, 14 May 2007 (CEST) Yes, it includes support for reattachment of generic derivations with actual parameters that are expanded types to generic derivations with actual parameters that are reference types.		--[[User:Alexander Kogtenkov\|Alexander Kogtenkov]] 13:42, 14 May 2007 (CEST) Yes, it includes support for reattachment of generic derivations with actual parameters that are expanded types to generic derivations with actual parameters that are reference types.
		+
		+	--[[User:Peter gummer\|Peter gummer]] 16:09, 14 May 2007 (CEST) Hi Alexander. Within an hour or so of asking that question here, Es-changes Digest, Vol 15, Issue 25, arrived in my Inbox with news that you have implemented this in revision 68280. What an unbelievable coincidence! Currently in EiffelStudio 6.0.6.8277, the following program fails with a VJAR error. Does this mean that it will compile successfully in the next release?
		+
		+	<e>
		+
		+	class ROOT_CLASS
		+	create make
		+
		+	feature make is
		+	local
		+	a: ARRAYED_LIST [PART_COMPARABLE]
		+	b: ARRAYED_LIST [INTEGER]
		+	do
		+	b := a
		+	end
		+
		+	end
		+
		+	</e>

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:42, 14 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	--[[User:Peter gummer\|Peter gummer]] 10:23, 14 May 2007 (CEST) The third complex task, "Other New expanded semantic": does that mean conformance of expanded generic parameters?		--[[User:Peter gummer\|Peter gummer]] 10:23, 14 May 2007 (CEST) The third complex task, "Other New expanded semantic": does that mean conformance of expanded generic parameters?

−	--[[User:Alexander Kogtenkov\|Alexander Kogtenkov]] 15:~~38 (GMT+3:00)~~, 14 May 2007 Yes, it includes support for reattachment of generic derivations with actual parameters that are expanded types to generic derivations with actual parameters that are reference types.	+	--[[User:Alexander Kogtenkov\|Alexander Kogtenkov]] 13:42, 14 May 2007 (CEST) Yes, it includes support for reattachment of generic derivations with actual parameters that are expanded types to generic derivations with actual parameters that are reference types.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:40, 14 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	--[[User:Peter gummer\|Peter gummer]] 10:23, 14 May 2007 (CEST) The third complex task, "Other New expanded semantic": does that mean conformance of expanded generic parameters?		--[[User:Peter gummer\|Peter gummer]] 10:23, 14 May 2007 (CEST) The third complex task, "Other New expanded semantic": does that mean conformance of expanded generic parameters?

−	Yes, it includes support for reattachment of generic derivations with actual parameters that are expanded types to generic derivations with actual parameters that are reference types.	+	--[[User:Alexander Kogtenkov\|Alexander Kogtenkov]] 15:38 (GMT+3:00), 14 May 2007 Yes, it includes support for reattachment of generic derivations with actual parameters that are expanded types to generic derivations with actual parameters that are reference types.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:36, 14 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	--[[User:Peter gummer\|Peter gummer]] 10:23, 14 May 2007 (CEST) The third complex task, "Other New expanded semantic": does that mean conformance of expanded generic parameters?		--[[User:Peter gummer\|Peter gummer]] 10:23, 14 May 2007 (CEST) The third complex task, "Other New expanded semantic": does that mean conformance of expanded generic parameters?
		+
		+	Yes, it includes support for reattachment of generic derivations with actual parameters that are expanded types to generic derivations with actual parameters that are reference types.